The Family First Party today renewed its call for the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) to be abolished, condemning the Commission’s latest divisive race-based agenda to re-name Harmony Day.
The AHRC’s proposal to rename Harmony Day so it could teach Australians they were systematically racist was preposterous.

Family First rejects the AHRC’s critical race theory and its crazy idea that Harmony Day ‘hides racism’.
Australians are among the most welcoming people in the world, not a racist nation as implied by the AHRC.

Millions of migrants who have made Australia home, embracing Australian culture and values are testament to just how wrong the AHRC is.

Taxpayer dollars should not fund an institution that labels Australians as racist.

Family First supports schools celebrating Australia’s successful multiracial society but stressed that all people – regardless of race – should embrace Australian culture and values.

We oppose any ideology that pits students against each other based on race. Unity, not division, should be at the heart of education.

Family First strongly opposes the AHRC’s push to rename Harmony Day as the International Day for the Elimination of Racial Discrimination.

If elected to the Senate, Family First Senators will move to abolish the AHRC and remove its divisive programs from school curricula.

Australians deserve policies that unite, not divide – and Family First is committed to ensuring taxpayer dollars are spent on initiatives that strengthen, not weaken, our national identity.

Contact [email protected]

The legal battle between Sall Grover, founder of the female-only networking app Giggle, and transgender activist Roxanne Tickle escalated last week.

Despite winning the initial case last year — where a Federal Court judge ruled that a male could become a female under former Prime Minister Julia Gillard’s absurd amendment to the Sex Discrimination Act — Tickle is now counter-suing.

This is in the face of Grover’s appeal to the High Court against the Federal Court’s bizarre ruling in the biological male’s favour.

It’s confusing. Feel free to read the above sentences again – slowly.

If Family First Senate candidates are elected, they will fight not only for the law to be changed in favour of girls and women, but they will fight for the federal government to pay Grover’s legal fees.

Tickle, a man who appropriates a woman’s identity, is now seeking to upgrade his original ruling from indirect to direct discrimination, demanding additional damages and aggravated damages.

This latest development underscores the absurdity and injustice Grover continues to face.

Giggle was created as a safe space for biological women, yet defending this principle has cost Sall Grover more than three years of stress and legal battles.

She has now filed an appeal, but the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) is once again intervening to support Tickle’s case.

As Sall noted, “If you don’t believe in gender ideology, they can do this to you.”

The implications of this case go far beyond Giggle.

It’s about the right to defend biological truth, protect women-only spaces, and uphold freedom of speech, belief, and association.

Grover’s courageous stand is a reminder of the importance of fighting back against radical gender ideology and its infiltration into Australia’s legal system.

Australian politicians stand condemned for doing nothing to remedy the law, sitting passively by while Grover fights in the courts.

Family First stands in solidarity with Sall Grover and is running candidates at the up-coming federal election committed to amending the Sex Discrimination Act to restore the biological definition of "woman" in Australian law.

This is essential to ensure that private companies and organisations can provide spaces exclusively for women and girls without fear of legal retribution.

Grover’s fight is a costly one, with legal fees expected to run into the millions.

Supporters are encouraged to contribute to her legal fund at www.gigglecrowdfund.com.

• Sall Grover should not be in legal trouble for this
• Girls' and women's rights at stake
• Court case starts Thursday