In his latest show on ADH TV, Lyle Shelton spoke with Hobart City Councillor Louise Elliot about her legal troubles and the “re-education” she was subjected to last week.

Louise Elliot found herself in a legal battle after speaking at the Let Women Speak rally in Hobart, Tasmania, where she made comments asserting that trans women are men. This statement led to a complaint filed against her for inciting hatred.

The interview highlighted the challenges faced by individuals who dare to express opinions that contradict the prevailing gender ideology. This blog post aims to delve deeper into the issue, discussing the broader context and implications of such legal battles and re-education sessions.


WATCH on YouTube


The Legal Battle

Louise Elliot's case is just one example of a growing trend where individuals who express dissenting views on transgender issues find themselves in legal trouble. In her case, the complaint alleged that she incited hatred by stating that trans women are men. This raises important questions about freedom of speech and the ability to express personal beliefs, even if they run counter to popular or prevailing ideologies.

Re-education Sessions

Perhaps the most concerning aspect of Louise Elliot's ordeal is the re-education session she was made to attend. This session, conducted by an organization called Working It Out Tasmania, aimed to change her perspective on gender and sexuality. It's essential to analyse the content and approach of such sessions, as they have far-reaching implications for freedom of thought and expression.

Freedom of Speech and Dissent

Freedom of speech is a fundamental right in democratic societies. It encompasses the right to express one's opinions, even if they are unpopular or controversial. However, the increasing use of legal action and re-education attempts to silence dissenting voices on transgender issues raises concerns about the state of free speech in today's world.

The Implications

The implications of Louise Elliot's case and others like it are significant. They signal a broader cultural and legal shift in how society deals with dissenting views on gender and sexuality. It is essential to ask whether silencing dissenting voices serves the greater good or stifles the open exchange of ideas and debate that is crucial in democratic societies.

Supporting Those in Legal Battles

Individuals facing legal battles over their opinions often rely on crowdfunding and community support to cover legal expenses. The support from the community can make a substantial difference in their ability to defend their right to free speech and challenge what they see as unjust legal actions.


The case of Councillor Louise Elliot serves as a stark reminder of the challenges faced by those who dare to voice dissenting opinions on transgender issues. It raises important questions about freedom of speech, the role of legal institutions, and the impact of re-education attempts on individual rights and democratic values. In a world that values diversity of thought, it's crucial to foster open and respectful dialogue on complex and controversial topics, while also safeguarding fundamental rights and freedoms.